Curriculum Intelligence

See where learning is breaking down. Before the data tells you.

Curriculum performance and learner support data have lived in different systems for two decades. The Curriculum Intelligence dashboard connects them, so the moment a cohort underperforms, you can already see which learners need support, why, and what to do.

Book a demo →See the full platform

How it works

Before the intelligence, there's the curriculum.

Curriculum Intelligence isn't just a dashboard bolted onto your data: it's how the curriculum gets run in the first place.

Import what you already teach. Bring in a curriculum, course, or project as a ready-made module, no need to rebuild it from scratch.

Assign it your way. Roll it out to the whole school, a single group or class, or an individual learner.

Record progress at task and outcome level. Track completion down to the individual task, and see it roll up automatically to subject-level progress.

See progress against expectation, not just completion. Every learner and class is tracked against the progress expected for the current term dates.

Compare the class to the individual, at every stage. See average class progress and how each learner is performing at any segment of the curriculum.

Feeds straight into your reports. Curriculum progress pulls directly into PAGS custom reports, ready for governors, parents, or an EHCP review.

THE QUESTION YOU CAN NOW ANSWER

Is this a teaching problem, or a SEN problem?

Without the SEN filter, a cohort just looks behind. Switch it on to see how much of that gap is being driven by learners with identified SEN needs. Same signal, very different actions.

Without SEN filter With SEN filter

SCENARIO 01 · YEAR 2 MATHS

A cohort is behind.

34%

of the Y2 Maths cohort are behind expected progress. On its own, that just looks like underperformance. The cause isn't yet clear.

Without context

It looks like a curriculum delivery issue. The action is unclear and risks targeting the wrong root cause.

62%

of the underperforming Y2 Maths cohort have identified SEN needs. This isn’t a teaching gap. It’s a provision gap.

Action

Review provision and targeted support. Allocate intervention time to the learners whose support plans need updating.

SCENARIO 02 · YEAR 8 ENGLISH

Same signal. Different cause.

22%

of the Y8 English cohort are behind expected progress. Same signal as the previous scenario: flat, without context.

Without context

It looks identical to a SEN-driven dip. The school risks chasing the wrong intervention.

12%

of the underperforming Y8 English cohort have identified SEN needs. The pattern doesn’t fit SEN. It’s a curriculum delivery question.

Action

Review curriculum delivery. The intervention belongs in lesson design and pedagogy, not in SEN support.

The three-system problem

Curriculum data, MIS data, and SEND data have never been in the same room.

Schools have great curriculum tools. Great MIS. Great SEND platforms. None of them speak to each other. Cohort underperformance is visible. The reason it’s happening is invisible.

Your curriculum tool

Shows you which cohorts are below threshold. Stops there. No way to filter by learner need. No way to drill to individual learner profile.

Your MIS

Records attendance, grades, and statutory data. Wasn’t designed to answer questions about provision impact or developmental progress.

Your SEND tool

Holds the support plan for 60 identified learners. Disconnected from the curriculum data that says they’re falling behind in Year 2 Maths.

The SEN filter: the headline insight

One click changes the conversation in every leadership meeting.

When the Year 2 Maths cohort drops 10 points below the school average, every headteacher asks the same question: is this a teaching problem, or are we under-supporting learners with identified needs?

Apply the SEN filter in PAGS. If 68% of the underperformers have identified needs and current provision for Fractions is insufficient, you have your answer. Change the provision. Track the impact. The gap closes.

See it from the headteacher perspective →

Screenshot of the PAGS curriculum intelligence screen

The five-layer dashboard

Whole-school down to individual learner, in five layers.

Each layer drills into the next without leaving PAGS. From governance overview to a learner profile in three clicks.

Layer 1 · Whole-school view. Every subject, every year group. Completion rates and progress status at a glance. The view you take into a governor meeting.
Layer 2 · Subject intelligence. Drill into a subject. See learning-outcome level performance, not just headline grade. Identify the specific concept where learning is breaking down.
Layer 3 · Cohort view. Filter by year group, class, or learner need. Group underperforming learners with one click, then apply targets or provision at group level.
Layer 4 · Learner-level view. Individual performance with names, not just numbers. Single-click drill-down to the full learner profile, current targets, and Pupil Passport.
Layer 5 · Provision impact. For each flagged learner: which interventions are in place, what they cost, and the impact score from progress data. Decision-ready.

Role views

Same data. Different view per role.

Curriculum Intelligence presents itself differently for the SENCO, the teacher, and the headteacher, because they’re asking different questions of the same data.

For SENCOs

Find the learners who need support

Layer 4: learner-level view filtered by identified needs. See exactly which learners are below threshold in each subject, and one-click drill into their profile to apply targets or provision.

For Teachers

Before the lesson, not after the data drop

Layer 3: class-level cohort view. See which learning outcomes your class is below on, what each learner needs, and surface the most relevant target for today’s topic.

For Headteachers

Whole-school visibility on a Tuesday morning

Layer 1 + 2: whole-school view down to subject and outcome level. Spot underperforming cohorts and apply the SEN filter before the data becomes an end-of-year problem.

Before and after

What changes when curriculum data and SEND data live in one system.

Before · three disconnected systems

Cohort underperformance shows up at term end. Cause unknown.
SENCO and head triangulate between curriculum data, MIS, and the SEND tool to find the “why”.
Three weeks pass. The next data drop is already on the horizon.
Provision decisions are made on instinct, not on filtered evidence.

After · curriculum + SEND in one view

Cohort underperformance is visible week by week, not term by term.
SEN filter applies in one click: the “why” is on the screen.
Group action: apply a target or provision to the flagged cohort in one step.
Impact is tracked from the same dashboard. Closes the loop.

PAGS has given us complete visibility across all of our schools for the first time. We can see best practice in one school and apply it in another, because every school is working from the same curriculum and SEND view.

Linda Stevens · SENCO Lead, ALET Education Trust

6 schools across Berkshire, outer London and Oxfordshire