If each school does SEND differently, you don’t have a system. You have risk.

Six schools. Six approaches to SEND.
No way to compare them.

PAGS standardises learner support infrastructure across every school in your trust, giving you a trust-level dashboard, governance-ready evidence, cross-school EHCP pipeline visibility, and the ability to identify provision quality risk before it becomes a board-level concern.

Talk to our MAT team →A trust conversation: typically 45–60 minutes

Every learner, seen as a whole.

Four areas connect around one profile, so nothing is decided in isolation.

Diagram showing cognition and learning, communication and interaction, SEMH, and sensory and physical needs all connecting around one whole-learner profile.
WHAT PAGS REPLACES

Six schools, six approaches. One platform.

Trust-level visibility shouldn’t depend on collecting spreadsheets from each school. PAGS replaces the trust-wide patchwork with one consistent layer.

Before PAGS
With PAGS
Every school in the trust does SEND differently. Different tools, different processes, different evidence.
One standardised platform across every school. Same workflows, same evidence structure, same audit trail.
Building a trust-level view = collecting spreadsheets from each school the week before the board meeting.
Live trust-wide rollup of provision, cost, staffing, and impact. Filter by school, area of need, year group, funding risk in one dashboard.
Best practice doesn’t travel between schools. Each SENCO reinvents target banks and intervention libraries.
Target banks, intervention libraries, and provision frameworks shared across the trust. Promote the best, reduce duplication.
Governance reports compiled by hand each term, with no way to verify the numbers behind them.
Board-ready exports generated from live data. Trust SEND overview, school comparison, provision impact, EHCP pipeline, risk areas, in one pack.
Risk patterns invisible at trust level. High-spend low-impact schools only surface when something goes wrong.
Cross-school benchmarking surfaces patterns automatically. Find the practice that works. Share it. Reduce the risk before it becomes an incident.
Five governance problems

Board-room language. Same five issues, every trust.

01
Inconsistency

Each school uses different tools. There is no consistent assessment approach. You cannot compare progress across schools because no two schools define progress the same way. Board-level reporting is impossible.

02
Visibility

Your governance board asks about SEND provision quality. You ask each school. You get six different answers in six different formats. You cannot give the board a single, credible picture.

03
Best practice

Best practice exists in your strongest school. It has never transferred to the others. You know who the best SENCO in the trust is. You cannot replicate what they do without deploying them physically.

04
Risk

A school in your trust receives an Ofsted concern about SEND. You have no trust-wide audit trail. You cannot demonstrate that the concern has been addressed systemically, only locally.

05
Spend

You are spending on SEND provisions across the trust. Some schools are achieving excellent outcomes per pound. Others are not. You cannot see which is which without a meeting with every SENCO in the portfolio.

The governance shift

Standardise the infrastructure. Not the judgement.

Every school in your trust uses the same assessment frameworks, the same target-setting system, the same reporting tools. Each school still makes its own decisions. But now you can see them all: compare them, benchmark them, and act on the ones that matter.

Risk management

When one school’s data looks anomalous, low progress, high EHCP refusal rate, low provision impact scores, it is visible at trust level before it becomes an Ofsted finding.

Best practice transfer

When one school finds a provision that produces above-benchmark outcomes, that approach is visible to every SENCO in the trust. Best practice spreads through the system, not through occasional cross-school visits.

The CEO question

“What is the quality of SEND provision across the trust?” is no longer a question that requires a tour of six schools or a six-way data request. It’s a dashboard.

The trust dashboard

What sits on your screen on a Tuesday morning.

Cross-school comparison

Every school’s SEN progress scores, EHCP pipeline, provision spend, and usage data in one table. Sort by performance. Identify the schools that need support, before they become a governance risk.

EHCP pipeline: trust level

How many EHCPs are in progress across the trust? What is the total funding impact? Evidence quality per application? Which schools are under-applying and which are over-burdened? CEO-level questions, answered.

Provision spend

Cost per learner per provision, per school. Impact score per intervention. Total trust SEND spend. Benchmarked across schools. Your argument for the SEND budget, built by the system, presented at board level.

Best practice identifier

Which school is achieving the best outcomes per intervention? Which SENCO’s approach is producing results above trust average? Visible in one view. Shareable in one click.

Governance evidence

A trust-wide evidence base for inspection, for the board, and for funding bids. Every school’s SEND management documented, consistent, timestamped, and exportable.

Financial dashboards

Coming soon

Aggregated high-needs funding, SEND cost per pupil across the trust, per-school benchmarking. The financial picture your CFO needs, without a manual data-gathering exercise.

Portfolio safeguarding

2027

Integrated safeguarding and behaviour tracking across every school in the trust, replacing standalone safeguarding and behaviour tools at portfolio scale. One governance system for the whole child.

The commercial case: trust scale

Most trusts pay for fragmentation. PAGS replaces it.

The fragmented cost

£15,000 – £40,000 / year

is a typical estimate across six schools, depending on which tools are combined. Three to five separate tools per school might include:

  • SEMH support tool
  • Behaviour assessment tool
  • Provision Map
  • Standalone assessment tools
  • Spreadsheets
  • Behaviour tracking tool
  • Curriculum planning tools

No cross-school visibility. No governance layer. Six contracts, six renewals, six different sets of training.

The PAGS model

One platform. Every school.

Trust pricing structured for portfolio deployment:

  • No per-pupil charges
  • No tiered features
  • Every school gets the full platform from day one
  • Curriculum Intelligence, assessments, EHCP packs, provision mapping, parent portal: included
  • Add a school? Same dashboard the next day

No hardware. No installation. No IT project. Schools are operational on the day they receive login credentials.

ALET Education Trust: the peer reference

6 schools. One platform. Cross-school visibility for the first time.

PAGS has given us complete visibility across all of our schools for the first time. We now have a standardised approach to SEND assessment and planning, which means any school in the trust can see best practice from another and apply it straight away.

Linda Stevens · SENCO Lead, ALET Education Trust

6 schools across Berkshire, outer London and Oxfordshire

“PAGS gives our leadership team the high-level data needed to make decisions about resource allocation and provision across multiple sites. It is the only tool we have found that genuinely works for the individual SENCO, the classroom teacher, and the trust director at the same time.”
ALET Education Trust

UCL validation · Deployed across UK, UAE, Belgium, and Kenya

Before you book: PAGS shows you which pupils are falling behind, why, and what to do next.

UCL validated · 4 countries · From £1,450/year · GDPR compliant